Are There ‘Sick Day’ Bounty Hunters?

Wouldn't hiring a bounty hunter cost more than the actual sick day missed?

Here’s a story about US workers who had bounty hunters chase them when they took ‘sick days’.

(Bloomberg Businessweek) The Sick-Day Bounty Hunters

As an alarming number of workers play hooky, corporations are clamping down — and calling in the detectives.

Rick Raymond parked his black Kia SUV behind a row of trees and peered out at his target. It was 4 a.m. on a recent morning, and Raymond — a seasoned private detective who has worked roughly 300 cases, from thieves to philandering spouses — was closing in on a different sort of prey. Recently, Raymond has come to occupy a new and expanding niche in the surveillance universe. Corporations pay him to spy on workers who take “sick days” when they may not, in fact, be sick. Such suspicion has led Raymond to bowling alleys, pro football games, weddings, and even funerals. On this morning it has taken him to a field outside the home of an Orlando repairman whose employer is doubtful about his slow recovery from a car accident. Although Raymond tries to be impartial about his subjects, “80 to 85 percent of the time,” he says, “there’s definitely fraud happening.”

Playing hooky without getting caught — as immortalized in the cat-and-mouse skirmish between Ferris Bueller and Principal Rooney in “Ferris Bueller’s Day Off” — used to be an adolescent rite of passage. Now it has given rise to a thriving industry, with stern legal precedent to back it up. In 2008, Raybestos Products, a car parts manufacturer in Crawfordsville, Ind., hired an off-duty police officer to track an employee suspected of abusing her paid medical leave. When the employee, Diana Vail, was fired after the cop produced substantial evidence that she was exploiting her benefits, she sued Raybestos. In what became the landmark case for corporate snooping, the 7th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals dismissed her lawsuit. A panel of judges declared that while surveillance “may not be preferred employer behavior,” it wasn’t unlawful. According to Susan W. Kline, a partner at the Baker & Daniels law firm in Indianapolis, the case “encouraged [companies] to consider hiring their own private detectives.” It also set a precedent, she says, that “reasonable suspicion” is sufficient justification for employer spying.

Such techniques have become permissible at a time when workers are more likely to play hooky. Kronos, a workforce productivity firm in Chelmsford, Mass., recently found that 57 percent of U.S. salaried employees take sick days when they’re not really sick — a nearly 20 percent increase from statistics gathered between 2006 and 2008. Taking such risks amid an economic meltdown, suggests Kronos Senior Director Joyce Maroney, has less to do with foolish confidence than a general lack of enthusiasm for work. “People are staying in jobs they don’t like because of a fear that there won’t be another job out there,” she says. “With less job satisfaction, there’s a greater propensity for sick-time abuse.”

(Click here to see the original article)

Be first to comment